Scoring Team Introduction Videos
Last updated
Last updated
Objective: Clearly present introduction to team and team's personality.
Submission Format: Video
Overview: Delivering ideas in a clear and convincing manner is critical to bringing the project to life and helping project supporters understand ideas and be convinced of potential. The video should introduce the team and provide an overview of the team's personality.
Tell a story... don't simply give a list of parts or restate what was included in the TDR
Use visual aids, such as graphics, or add captions to any audio that is not perfectly clear
Video must be conducted in English or include subtitles in English.
Video must be no more than three (3) minutes in length.
Video may include graphics, vehicle performance, and/or simulation.
Teams are required to create a video introducing their team members and highlighting their team personality. This video is meant to be a creative showcase of what makes each team unique, such as the mission of the team or the team culture. Teams should consider this video as an “elevator pitch” or project proposal for an opportunity to earn additional funding or support.
To complete the Team Introduction Video evaluation, judges use a detailed scoring rubric. The maximum score for the Team Introduction Video submission is 120 points. Reviews can be done anytime convenient for you, as long as your scores are submitted by August 4th at 11:59 PM EDT.
Strong
All formatting guidelines are followed. Video is conducted in English or includes English subtitles, video is no more than 3 minutes in length, and video is hosted on the team’s website or YouTube channel.
Requirements Not Met
Video does not follow formatting requirements.
Outstanding
Visuals immediately draws attention. Overall, the video is solid in frame (not shaky), correctly lighted, in precision focus, appropriately segmented, and visually clear in all respects. Transitions between segments are clear and smooth. The video is less than 3 minutes total runtime.
Strong
Good visual impression. Majority of video is clear, adequately lit, and places people and objects in recognizable scale and perspective. Video segments are generally of the appropriate length, transition well, and are related to each other. Use of video effects is good. Runtime is less than 3 minutes.
Average
Video quality is satisfactory.
Below Average
Frames and segments are shaky, distracting or poorly lit. Some segments are out of focus. Some heavy shadows are obscuring viewpoint. Visual effects are distracting rather than informative. Video exceeds 3 minutes in length.
Requirements Not Met
No focus on visual quality. Video exceeds 3 minutes in length.
Outstanding
Video is a complete introduction of the team makeup including team members, sub-teams, activities, mentors, and major sponsors. Organization of video information is logical and compelling.
Strong
The viewer is left with good understanding of the information shared in video.
Average
Video information is somewhat scattered throughout video, leaving the viewer lacking complete understanding of project.
Below Average
Video provides incomplete information regarding the team members, activities, or progress. The information presented is extraneous, confusing, or low quality.
Requirements Not Met
No organizational strategy is apparent.
Outstanding
Effective and compelling use of video medium to communicate the introduction of the team. Easy for non-technical viewer to understand and support. [You're left wanting to learn more.]
Strong
Exhibits moderately compelling use of video medium to communicate the introduction of the team. Strong potential, moderately compelling, mostly understandable to non-technical viewer. [You're left strongly considering to learn more.]
Average
Adequately uses the video medium to introduce the team. Not difficult to understand, but not compelling either.
Below Average
Exhibits some ability to use video to attempt to introduce team and project overview. Difficult for viewer to understand and/or was not compelling. [You're left unenthused.]
Requirements Not Met
Poorly used video medium to convey team introduction. Information was as not clearly understood and was not compelling. [You're left with little information.]
Oustanding
Team creativity and enthusiasm is clearly evident in the video. Appropriate use of humor is understated and well done. Video captures user’s attention without diminishing or obscuring the information delivered. Effects of careful postproduction editing are clear.
Strong
Some creativity has been used throughout video. The visual style and tone are consistent throughout video.
Average
Exhibits a moderate attempt at creativity.
Below Average
Little attempt made to include creative or imaginative ideas in video. Poor visual effects and enthusiasm for the project.
Requirements Not Met
Little imagination or creativity is evident in production. Information is presented lacking enthusiasm.
One of the main requests we receive from our teams every year is to receive comments and feedback from you, our judges.
You will see this section at the bottom of each scoresheet where you can leave your feedback and comments. These comments will be shared with teams following the competition.
Please see the Judge Comment Guidelines lesson below for tips on writing effective comments for the teams.
The comments you leave here are only visible to the RoboNation team and will not be shared with the teams.
Use this comment section to recommend the team for a special award, emphasize something that really stood out to you, or share any concerns you have.
Follow the guidelines provided in the (excerpt below)
