Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Teams are required to create a video introducing their team members and highlighting their team personality. This video is meant to be a creative showcase of what makes each team unique, such as the mission of the team or the team culture. Teams should consider this video as an “elevator pitch” or project proposal for an opportunity to earn additional funding or support.
Video must be conducted in English or include subtitles in English.
Video must be no more than three (3) minutes in length.
Video may include graphics, vehicle performance, and/or simulation.
Videos must be hosted by team. Teams have the choice of hosting on YouTube, Vimeo, or on their Team Website. The video must follow YouTube Rules & Policies, including appropriate music copyright management.
The team video submission is worth a total of 120 points. The scoring metrics include a scoring weight with guidance for scoring considerations that are provided to the judges during evaluations.
Strong
All formatting guidelines are followed. Video is conducted in English or includes English subtitles, video is no more than 3 minutes in length, and video is hosted on the YouTube, Vimeo, or on their Team Website.
Requirements Not Met
Video does not follow formatting requirements.
Outstanding
Visuals immediately draws attention. Overall, the video is solid in frame (not shaky), correctly lighted, in precision focus, appropriately segmented, and visually clear in all respects. Transitions between segments are clear and smooth. The video is less than 3 minutes total runtime.
Strong
Good visual impression. Majority of video is clear, adequately lit, and places people and objects in recognizable scale and perspective. Video segments are generally of the appropriate length, transition well, and are related to each other. Use of video effects is good. Runtime is less than 3 minutes.
Average
Video quality is satisfactory.
Below Average
Frames and segments are shaky, distracting or poorly lit. Some segments are out of focus. Some heavy shadows are obscuring viewpoint. Visual effects are distracting rather than informative. Video exceeds 3 minutes in length.
Requirements Not Met
No focus on visual quality. Video exceeds 3 minutes in length.
Outstanding
Video is a complete introduction of the team makeup including team members, sub-teams, activities, mentors, and major sponsors. Organization of video information is logical and compelling.
Strong
The viewer is left with good understanding of the information shared in video.
Average
Video information is somewhat scattered throughout video, leaving the viewer lacking complete understanding of project.
Below Average
Video provides incomplete information regarding the team members, activities, or progress. The information presented is extraneous, confusing, or low quality.
Requirements Not Met
No organizational strategy is apparent.
Outstanding
Effective and compelling use of video medium to communicate the introduction of the team. Easy for non-technical viewer to understand and support. [You're left wanting to learn more.]
Strong
Exhibits moderately compelling use of video medium to communicate the introduction of the team. Strong potential, moderately compelling, mostly understandable to non-technical viewer. [You're left strongly considering to learn more.]
Average
Adequately uses the video medium to introduce the team. Not difficult to understand, but not compelling either.
Below Average
Exhibits some ability to use video to attempt to introduce team and project overview. Difficult for viewer to understand and/or was not compelling. [You're left unenthused.]
Requirements Not Met
Poorly used video medium to convey team introduction. Information was as not clearly understood and was not compelling. [You're left with little information.]
Outstanding
Team creativity and enthusiasm is clearly evident in the video. Appropriate use of humor is understated and well done. Video captures user’s attention without diminishing or obscuring the information delivered. Effects of careful post-production editing are clear.
Strong
Some creativity has been used throughout video. The visual style and tone are consistent throughout video.
Average
Exhibits a moderate attempt at creativity.
Below Average
Little attempt made to include creative or imaginative ideas in video. Poor visual effects and enthusiasm for the project.
Requirements Not Met
Little imagination or creativity is evident in production. Information is presented lacking enthusiasm.
Judges inspect the team’s ASV and assess technical design, technical innovation, and craftsmanship of the design. Teams receive an assigned 30-minute slot. After the assessment, teams should make themselves available for a team photo and optional video interview. Please find the latest assessment schedule here: roboboat.org/2025.
Team members should be present to answer technical questions posed by the judges during this inspection and be prepared to explain their design strategy and how decisions made impacts on the technical design, functionality, and craftsmanship.
The system assessment is worth a total of 180 points. The scoring metrics include a scoring weight with guidance for scoring considerations that are provided to the judges during evaluations.
Outstanding
Design and implementation of systems and subsystems are well aligned with team's strategy, design decisions, and engineering principles. Clear and thoughtful design choices are evident in the technical functions, key decisions, and testing regimen.
Strong
Good and knowledgeable rationale and execution of design selections made, aligning with team's strategy, design decisions, and engineering principles.
Average
Adequate explanation of technical design decisions, equipment selections, and testing regimen, mostly evident in the vehicle and subsystems.
Below Average
Rationale of technical design is briefly covered with minimal alignment with team's strategy, design decisions, and engineering principles.
Requirements Not Met
Design and implementation of systems and subsystems are not aligned with team's strategy, design decisions, and engineering principles.
Outstanding
Full system demonstrates creative and innovative solutions by applying existing technology in novel ways within the system, using existing technology in a previously unintended way, or creating new technology or products incorporated into the system.
Strong
Clear evidence of innovative approaches across multiple sub-systems. Research and testing were conducted throughout the development process.
Average
There is moderate evidence that creative and innovative solutions were incorporated into system to improve performance.
Below Average
Little evidence of creativity or innovation in design choices throughout the system.
Requirements Not Met
No technical innovation noted.
Outstanding
System is assembled with exquisite care and thoughtful attention to detail and aesthetics. Construction and improvisations are neatly executed to maintain high levels of functionality, durability, and adherence to the team's design philosophy. Any vehicle adornment demonstrates creativity, originality, etc.
Strong
System is assembled with care and attention to detail and aesthetics. Construction and improvisations maintain acceptable levels of functionality, durability, and adherence to the team's design philosophy.
Average
System is assembled to execute acceptable levels of functionality, durability and adherence to team’s design philosophy.
Below Average
Minimal evidence that system is assembled with care and attention to detail and aesthetics. Adherence to team’s design philosophy is vague and unclear.
Requirements Not Met
Evident hazards or potential hazards throughout the system. The system was assembled with minimal care and attention to detail. Little to no attention to aesthetics.
The 2025 RoboBoat Competition (RoboBoat 2025) will be conducted March 4-9, 2025, at the Nathan Benderson Park in Sarasota, Florida. Multiple courses will be used for the competition.
RoboBoat 2025 includes (1) the Autonomy Challenge that demonstrates autonomous performance and safety; and (2) Design Documentation that presents each team’s work and vehicle design.
Student teams from anywhere in the world are eligible to participate. All teams must build an ASV to compete and only enter one vehicle in the competition. *
*First-year teams are eligible to participate in RoboBoat without an ASV. These teams are expected to participate in Design Documentation and send representatives on-site at the event as a learning experience. First-year teams are expected to indicate this option in their registration form.
Teams must be comprised of 75% or more full-time students. Student members are expected to make significant contributions to the engineering development cycle of their ASV.
The majority of team members must be college or high school students. Teams may also include middle school students. Interdisciplinary teams are encouraged.
Teams may be comprised of 25% or less alumni, industry, academic or government partners.
A minimum of three (3) team members are required for safe operations on-site at RoboBoat.
The event schedule is also available on the RoboBoat website.
Online
04 October - 18 December
Registration
20 January
Event Submission Deadline:
Team Member Registration
Team Demographics
Merchandise Order
Vehicle Information
On-Site Requirements
27 January
Design Documentation Deadline:
Technical Design Report
Website
Team Introduction Video
Communicaty & Outreach (optional)
In-Person Event
04 March (morning)
Team Check-in / Orientation
Nathan Benderson Park
04-06 March
Practice Course Open
Qualifying Round
Design Presentations
System Assessments
Nathan Benderson Park
07-08 March
Semi-Finals Round
Nathan Benderson Park
09 March
Finals Round
Awards
Nathan Benderson Park
Each competition day starts and ends with a mandatory team meeting for all teams, conducted by the Technical Director. Team leads (or their designated team representative) are required to attend all meetings. All participants are strongly encouraged to attend.
The Technical Director summarizes the day’s events, describes any course changes for the following day, and teams are encouraged to provide feedback.
RoboBoat Questions:
Registration Questions:
On-Site Logistics/Safety:
All team members must abide by the RoboNation Code of Conduct while participating in the Competition. Failure to abide by this Code of Conduct at any point during the competition season may result in the disqualification of the team and/or participants from the Competition, components of the competition, the full competition, and/or future competitions.
Give your best effort. Display honesty, integrity, and sportsmanship while engaging in friendly competition. Compete fairly. Team products are solely the creation of student participants’ own efforts, ideas, and designs with supporting mentors providing only verbal advice.
Respect others. All participants and guests will display courtesy and respect toward officials, volunteers, other teams, and guests of the Competition.
Act with integrity. All participants and guests will behave in a responsible manner and follow the rules of the competition and host organization.
Support each other. All participants will embody the spirit of RoboNation and endeavor to engage with, learn from, and support one another.
(Online)
(Online)
(Online)
850.642.0536
This section includes detailed requirements and instructions for the design documentation portion of the competition.
Prior to the on-site competition, teams are required to develop and submit (1) technical design report, (2) team website, and (3) team introduction video. On-site at the competition, teams are required to conduct (1) an oral design strategy presentation and (2) system assessment by subject matter expert judges.
The following design documentation is delivered online before the on-site competition. Instructions on how to submit deliverables and the deadlines can be found in Section 1.4 Competition Schedule and Timeline. Teams are encouraged to refer to the past top-scored deliverables: roboboat.org/past-programs.
The following design documentation is delivered on-site during the competition.
Teams are required to submit a website in English that documents their team, vehicle design, and competition approach.
Website Content: Layout and detailed contents of the website are left for the teams to develop; however, the team website must include:
Current team name and contact information
Vehicle photos and/or videos
Supporting media, which may include:
Instructional/Informative videos
Procedures (text, images)
Design decision documentation (text, images, videos)
Blogs for historical records of build progress
List of sponsors with logos
Website Quality: Websites are often the first impression of a project. Potential supporters such as supervisors, sponsors, or advisors must find the website visually appealing and easy to navigate. Development of the website should include careful consideration of user experience, including:
Written in English, or English translation provided
Clear prioritization of key content
Site search functionality
Basic design elements: contrast, repetition, alignment and grouping to organize/highlight content
User accessibility, as defined by the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative: www.w3.org/WAI
Cross browser compatibility for modern web browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, MS Edge)
A mobile friendly display
The website submission is worth a total of 180 points. The scoring metrics include a scoring weight with guidance for scoring considerations that are provided to the judges during evaluations.
Outstanding
Team website includes all required team information, including the team’s name and contact information, and a list of team members and sponsors. All mentions of the vehicle are relevant to the current competition year.
Strong
Team website provides a brief introduction to the team, team members and sponsors. There is supporting media on the vehicle.
Average
Team website introduces the team and/or team members.
Below Average
Team website provides little to no information on the team. There is no mention of the vehicle.
Requirements Not Met
The required team information is not included on the website.
Outstanding
Vehicle development and testing process is thoroughly documented with instructional and informative supporting media and historical recording. This could include photographs, diagrams, videos, procedures (text + images), design documentation (text + images + video), or blogs for historical records.
Strong
Good documentation on vehicle development and testing process is provided. Supporting media is accessible.
Average
Vehicle development and testing process is adequately presented with some evidence of supporting media.[LI1]
Below Average
Few pictures or videos of the vehicle, but no instructional or informative documentation included.
Requirements Not Met
No visuals or documentation of the vehicle is available on the website.
Outstanding
Website places a heavy emphasis on human factors. Layout is visually appealing, easily maneuverable, and does an excellent job of drawing user’s attention to relevant content.
Strong
Website considers user experience. Layout does a good job of drawing user’s attention. Users can navigate the site easily and quickly.
Average
Website quality was adequate. Users can navigate the site to find most information.
Below Average
Layout and/or design makes it difficult to find information. Website does not have a user-friendly display.
Requirements Not Met
Website is busy and difficult to read; no guidance on maneuvering site.
Teams are required to give a design strategy presentation to a panel of subject matter expert judges. The goal of the presentation is to share the team’s system design approach to the challenges presented in the Autonomy Challenge, specifically the capabilities required for each task. The presentation should include:
a concise description of the team's strategic vision, and
how the vehicle design compliments the team’s goals.
This presentation must be conducted in English and may include visual aids (i.e. digital slides, poster board). If digital slides are used, teams must provide their own computer and adapters for an HDMI connecter to use the presentation display monitor. Teams receive an assigned 30-minute presentation time. Please find the latest presentation schedule here: roboboat.org/2025. This presentation includes:
Team introduction video - 3 minutes
Team presentation – 20 minutes
Judges’ question and answer – 5 minutes
The design strategy presentation is worth a total of 180 points. The scoring metrics include a scoring weight with guidance for scoring considerations that are provided to the judges during evaluations.
Outstanding
Presentation includes a concise description of the team's strategic vision and how the vehicle design compliments their goals. The team clearly explains how they developed their competition strategy.
Strong
Presentation describes their competition strategy and how their vehicle design aligns with meeting their competition goals.
Average
Presentation includes a brief overview of how the vehicle design aligns with the team’s competition strategy and goals.
Below Average
Team mentions a competition strategy but no additional details on how it was developed or how it led to their strategic vision.
Requirements Not Met
Team does not mention their competition strategy, vision or how their vehicle design is aligned with vision.
Outstanding
Team presents their design process and how their decisions relate to their overall competition strategy. Lessons learned from testing or previous competition experience are described, including application throughout the design process.
Strong
Presentation includes a description of the team’s design process and includes narrative on how testing or previous experience influenced vehicle design.
Average
Team describes the rationale behind the vehicle design process.
Below Average
Presentation includes mention of the design process, lacking a clear rationale of design choices.
Requirements Not Met
No mention of the team’s design process or the rationale behind the design process.
Outstanding
Presentation materials and team members’ knowledge are effective and support the team's message. Team members are engaging, respectful, and professional, while interacting positively with the judges and each other.
Strong
Presentation materials are presented in a professional manner and support the team’s message. Presentation is well prepared and appears to be rehearsed in advance.
Average
Presentation materials are presented in a mostly professional manner and support the team’s message.
Below Average
Presentation materials and styles are adequate but less than engaging.
Requirements Not Met
The message was not effective, and the presentation was not organized.
Outstanding
The team effectively uses evidence, experience, and research from their project to inform responses to all questions and discussion posed by the judges.
Strong
The team responded professionally and knowledgeably to judges’ questions.
Average
The team responded adequately to most or all of the judges’ questions, mostly interacting with courtesy and professionalism.
Below Average
The team did not provide sufficient answers to the judges’ questions and interacted with minimal courtesy and professionalism.
Requirements Not Met
Team members were not able to respond to many or all questions and did not take the initiative to engage in dialogue with the judges.
Each team is required to submit a TDR that describes the team’s design principles and competition priorities. The report should address the rationale for which autonomy challenge tasks have been chosen to attempt and how this competition strategy influenced the design decisions for the hull, propulsion system, control systems, and autonomy system. Teams must follow the TDR instructions provided below. To be eligible for full points, teams must submit their TDR by the deadline found in Section 1.4.
A strong TDR provides a coherent narrative and addresses the elements of the rubric as much as possible, including citing references used. The competition strategy justifies the choices of autonomy challenge tasks and design decisions that trace back to those task choices. The report also identifies which software tools allow the team to accomplish the tasks chosen.
The technical design report is worth a total of 200 points. The outline of each content section includes a scoring weight with guidance for scoring considerations that are provided to the judges during evaluations.
The content of the written paper shall include the following sections:
Technical Content: Competition Strategy, Design Strategy, Testing Strategy
Appendix A: Test Plan & Results (optional)
The format of the written paper shall adhere to the following guidelines:
6 page limit (excluding References and Appendices)
8.5 x 11 in. page size
Margins ≥ 0.8 in.
Font: Times New Roman 12pt
Header on every page including team name and page number
Submitted in .pdf format
Optional Formatting: Teams may choose to follow the two-column format, editorial style for IEEE Conference Proceedings: www.ieee.org/conferences/publishing/templates.html.
RoboNation Tip: It is recommended that papers be peer-reviewed prior to submission. For example, teams can utilize resources at their institution, fellow students, or professional editing services.
Formatting Scoring Metrics (5% of score)
Strong
Paper follows page limit, and all formatting guidelines are followed. The document is professionally organized. All required sections are included and easy to identify. All grammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct. The style follows that expected of a scientific paper submitted for publication.
Requirements Not Met
Formatting guidelines are not followed and the layout is unorganized.
The abstract is a short summary of the main points in the paper. The abstract should summarize the linkage between overall competition strategy and system architecture, design, and engineering decisions.
Outstanding
Abstract is engaging, lists the scope of the work, and provides a thorough summary of the paper.
Strong
Abstract provides a strong overview of the scope of work and a detailed summary of the paper.
Average
An adequate explanation of the scope of work is included with a brief summary of the paper.
Below Average
Abstract provides a basic summary of the paper.
Poor
Abstract section is included but does not serve the intent of an abstract. The abstract is treated as an introduction and provides no summary of the paper.
Requirements Not Met
No abstract is included.
Participating in the competition, as in all research projects, involves leveraging resources and support beyond the efforts of individual team members. This support can take many forms such as technical advice, labor, equipment, facilities, and monetary contributions. Acknowledging those who have supported efforts is important.
Strong
Acknowledgements detail supporting personnel and their contributions as well as resources. Sponsors and their contributions are acknowledged.
Average
Acknowledgements include a list of supporters and sponsors with little or no detail of the support provided.
Poor
Acknowledgements provide a general thank you but do not specify particular contributions.
Requirements Not Met
No acknowledgements are included.
As with any technical publication, original ideas and content not generated by the paper’s authors should be properly cited. The references should follow the IEEE Conference Proceedings citation style.
Strong
Sources include notable technical references including technical papers and articles. Use of the source materials are evident in the TDR. Sources are thoroughly documented. The IEEE citation style is correctly utilized.
Average
Sources are adequate and documented correctly with the IEEE citation style is utilized.
Poor
Limited sources are documented but there is no adherence to the IEEE citation style.
Requirements Not Met
No sources or citations are documented.
The paper must include details on the team’s strategy for the competition, including the plans for approaching the course and how the vehicle design relates to this approach. The course consists of multiple tasks with associated points for accomplished behaviors. The only required task is navigating through the start gates. Teams may choose to attempt the other tasks and complete the tasks in any order. The more tasks a vehicle is designed and engineered to accomplish, the more complex the overall vehicle system will be.
Discuss the team's strategy on trade-offs between system complexity and reliability. For example, teams have a limited number of working hours to prepare for the competition; this time could be spent adding additional capabilities or testing and improving the reliability of an existing capability. As system complexity grows, changes in subsystems can propagate in unmanageable ways when time is limited. Based on history and the system engineering talents of the team, include a description the team’s strategic vision.
Outstanding
Detailed description of the team's strategic vision and how the vehicle design compliments their goals. Detailed discussion on trade-off studies between system complexity and reliability during design development process.
Strong
The team's goals are clearly evident but not discussed in detail. Trade-off studies evident but lacking details.
Average
Brief mention of team’s strategic goals and/or trade-off studies.
Below Average
Document hints at a goal for competition and/or trade-off studies.
Poor
Discussion of the team’s vision is incoherent; rationale for competition goals is not discussed.
Requirements Not Met
No mention of competition goals.
Given the strategy for success at the competition and the approach to managing complexity, the paper must include a description of the system design to meet the goals they established for the competition. Justification for design choices should be clear. Discuss how components and subsystems were selected and integrated on the vehicle. For teams that are working with a previously designed vehicle, discuss how the design meets the current competition strategy and any modifications needed at the component, subsystem, and/or integrated system levels. Describe the experience in making both architectural/design decisions and system engineering decisions.
This section should not include detailed component descriptions and/or specifications not of original design.
Outstanding
Provides in-depth explanations on design strategy and clearly identifies creative aspects of system. Creative design methodology is justified with required calculation steps and visual aids. Content clearly exhibits a Systems Engineering approach.
Strong
Provides explanations on design strategy and identifies creative aspects of system. Creative design methodology is justified with calculation steps and visual aids. Content hints at a Systems Engineering approach.
Average
Provides some information on design strategy and creative aspects of system. Creative design methodology is supported with a few calculations. Content could be justified as a Systems Engineering approach.
Below Average
Provides little information on design and creative design methodology. Little evidence to support applications of a Systems Engineering approach.
Poor
Provides limited information on the creative aspects of system. Creative design methodology is hypothesized. No evidence to support application of Systems Engineering principles.
Requirements Not Met
Creative aspects of design are not described.
Testing and experimentation is a crucial step to preparing and innovating a system design that strongly correlates with a competitive performance in the arena. The paper must include the approach to a testing strategy, including various test plans, both physically and in simulation.
Discuss considerations of the time needed to thoroughly test to meet the determined goals and the demands of design and engineering with those of testing and experimentation.
Outstanding
Testing approach is presented in great detail, to include test strategy and plans. Component testing, sensor and control systems testing done in accordance with a test plan.
Strong
Detailed testing approach, test strategy, and plans. Documentation shows good overview of components, sensors and control system testing.
Average
Testing approach is presented with sufficient detail, including mention of test strategy and plans. Documentation shows components, sensors and control system testing.
Below Average
Testing approach is presented with little to no detail. No mention of components or sensors testing.
Poor
Testing is done to a certain degree. No components and sensors are tested independently. There are no test plans.
Requirements Not Met
No mention of testing or connection with the system design.
Based off the testing approach outlined in the paper, this appendix showcases the test plan that was developed and the detailed results that came out of testing. Teams should present their plans for testing, including algorithm testing in a virtual environment, component testing in a laboratory setting, subsystem testing in a relevant environment, and full system testing in a pseudo-competition environment. Test set up should be included and results presented. Any design modifications or changes in competition strategy as a result of testing should be discussed.
While this appendix is not required, excellence seen in this section can be eligible for a special judges’ award.
The appendix may include detailed documentation covering the following areas:
Scope: Objectives and test cases (this may also specify what was not included in tests)
Schedule: Start/end dates and deadlines
Resource and Tools: Resources and tools needed to conduct tests and assess results
Environment: Description of the test environment, configurations, and availability
Risk Management: Outline potential risks that could occur throughout testing
Results: Detailed outcomes of test cases
Teams must provide a cart to move the vehicle around the competition site and launch the vehicle into the water.
Cart must be manually propelled on site, no motorized carts.
Cart's handle must be solid, no rope or chain.
Cart’s width must be less than thirty-six (36) inches.
Carts are recommended to have six (6) inch (or more) diameter rubberized wheels.
Carts must be able to get wet with minimal impact to function.
Carts must be negatively buoyant in the water.
Suggested carts: garden cart, available at homedepot.com; or dump cart, available at homedepot.com.
Prior to deploying in the water, the ASV must meet all safety requirements. At a minimum, the following areas are checked:
Emergency Stop System (location of switches, on-board and remote functionality)
Demonstration of remote Emergency Stop failsafe functionality by removing the batteries or turning off the remote Emergency Stop transmitter.
Safety issues related to a propeller or hazard
All components are properly secured
Towing points and tow harness is present and secure
More details on system requirements are available in Section 5.3: Vehicle Requirements.
Vehicles are weighed at the start of every day of the competition. Teams transport the vehicle on their cart to the scale (similar to a veterinary scale, available at scaleline.com) for weight measurement. The stable scale reading weight is recorded. Thrust is measured after the vehicle is deployed in the water either in manual or autonomous mode. The thrust value used is the highest scale reading that is stable for at least two seconds. Teams may opt to repeat their thrust measurement at each deployment.
During Finals runs, the vehicle must be re-weighed, and re-thrust tested every time it is launched into the water. If the vehicle stays in the water between finals runs, teams may forgo the weight and thrust test a second time. However, if a team is observed to be switching significant components or making modifications on their boat, the judges or TD staff may ask for a new measurement.
ASV weight > 140 lbs.
Disqualified!!!
140 lbs > ASV weight > 110
-250 - 5*(w - 110)
110 lbs > ASV weight > 70
2*(110 – w)
ASV weight ≤ 70 lbs
80 + (70 - w)
Dimensions greater than:
- three feet of width or
- three feet of height
- six feet of length
Disqualified!!!
Thrust (t) vs weight (w)
100*(t / w)
This section provides details of the tasks in the Autonomy Challenge. Teams are encouraged to develop a strategy approaching these tasks that best suits their ASV.
In a world where our waters are under siege... Pollution spreads, marine life suffers, and climate change threatens to upend the delicate balance of Earth’s oceans. But when the planet’s future hangs in the balance, a new breed of heroes emerge - not from outer space, but from the vastness of the ocean.
Meet the Guardians of the Waters, a team of ASVs, armed with powerful autonomy and a cutting-edge mission to protect our blue planet.
The Navigation Channel task is a navigation demonstration showcasing the basic autonomous control and sensing capabilities. The ASV must autonomously navigate through two pairs of red and green buoys. The entire ASV must pass through both sets of the gates, without touching the buoys. The ASV must start its autonomous navigation a minimum of 6 ft. before the first set of gates.
During the Semi-Finals/Finals Round: This task is mandatory for all teams to qualify for semi-finals and is required to be completed first during each scored run.
NOTE The position and orientation of this task with respect to the shoreline may change during the competition and teams should be able to handle navigating their ASV to the starting position and holding station with little to no line of site from the shore.
Buoys are supplied from Taylor Made, www.taylormadeproducts.com.
Port Marker Buoy
Taylor Made Sur-Mark Buoy
950410
Red
39in
(above waterline)
18in
Starboard Marker Buoy
Taylor Made Sur-Mark Buoy
950400
Green
39in
(above waterline)
18in
The Follow the Path task demonstrates the ability for the ASV to sense and maneuver through a complex path, staying within the defined pathway, and avoiding contact with obstacles along the way. The task consists of multiple sets of gates designated by pairs of red and green buoys. The ASV passes between the sets of gates without touching the buoys and avoids intermittent endangered species (yellow buoys) and stationary vessels, placed within the pathway.
While maneuvering the pathway, the ASV counts the number of endangered species (yellow buoys) and reports its findings, using the defined guidelines in Section 3.2.7: Task Reporting Guidelines.
Buoys are supplied from Polyform US, shop.polyform.com.
Gate Buoy
Polyform A-0
A-0
Classic Red
0.5 ft
(above waterline)
20.3 cm
Gate Buoy
Polyform A-0
A-0
Green
0.5 ft
(above waterline)
20.3 cm
Obstacle Buoy
Polyform A-0
A-0
Yellow
0.5 ft
(above waterline)
20.3 cm
Custom built vessels
Orange
Black
To navigate treacherous waters, the ASV demonstrates the ability to correctly sense, locate and maneuver into an empty docking bay that corresponds with the correct color/shape of the day. A number of docking bays will be occupied by other stationary vessels. If the ASV encounters an occupied docking bay with the correct color/shape, the ASV then must avoid that bay and look for another with the correct color/shape that is empty and available for docking. The ASV may make contact with the dock and will not be penalized, however an ASV that makes contact with a stationary vessel occupying a bay will not be eligible for full points awarded for this task.
The docking bays could have banners with any of the following:
Shapes – circle, triangle, square, plus sign
Colors – blue, green, red
Dock units are supplied from Jet Docks, www.jetdock.com.
Floating Dock
Large dock cubes
Item code: C000000008
Dock: 40 in. W x 10 ft. L x 16 in. H
Tines: 4-7 ft. L
Individual Cube: 20 in. x 20 in. x 16 in. H
Beige
Color/Shape Display
Vinyl Banner
24 in. x 24 in.
Red, Blue, Green Shapes
Custom built vessels
Orange
Black
The ASV demonstrates the ability to rapidly sense the task elements with object recognition and decision making. This task demonstrates hull form efficiency coupled with its propulsion system, and the resulting maneuverability.
The ASV enters and station-keeps inside a holding bay and observes the light panel. The light panel will change from red to green after a random interval, starting the race clock and indicating to the ASV to quickly pass through the gate buoys. The ASV enters through gate buoys, circumnavigates around the blue marker buoy (counterclockwise or clockwise), and exits back through the same gate buoys. The gate buoys are moored 6 to 10 ft apart, and the marker buoy is placed 40 to 100 ft, from the gate buoys. This is a timed task. Time starts when the light panel turns green and stops when the bow (front) of the ASV crosses the first set of gate buoys.
The ASV completes the task without coming into contact with intermittent oil spills (black buoys) and stationary vessels, positioned anywhere within the task. The ASV detects the number of oil spills (black buoys) and reports its findings, using the defined guidelines in Section 3.2.7: Task Reporting Guidelines.
Buoys are supplied from Polyform US, shop.polyform.com.
Gate Buoy
Polyform A-2
A-2
Classic Red
1 ft
(above waterline)
36.8 cm
Gate Buoy
Polyform A-2
A-2
Green
1 ft
(above waterline)
36.8 cm
Mark Buoy
Polyform A-2
A-2
Blue
1 ft
(above waterline)
36.8 cm
Obstacle Buoy
Polyform A-2
A-2
Black
1 ft
(above waterline)
36.8 cm
Custom built vessels
Orange
Black
The ASV demonstrates the ability to locate stationary vessels throughout the course and deliver necessary resources to the vessel. Up to three orange vessels and up to three black vessels will be positioned throughout the course.
The ASV locates the orange boats with a black triangle shape fixed to both sides of the vessel. The ASV delivers/shoots water at the black triangle shape. The ASV should should strike (with a steady and visible stream of water) the black triangle shape for at least 3 seconds. Performance of the ASV's ability to correctly and intentionally aim water at the target will be evaluated and scored by the judges observing the scoring run.
The ASV locates the black vessels with a black plus shape fixed to both sides of the vessel. The ASV delivers a racquetball to the vessel, either striking the plus sign or inside of the vessel hull; or simply dropping the ball into the hull of the vessel is acceptable. Teams will not be penalized if the ball does not stay in the stationary vessel after successfully hitting the plus sign or inside of the hull. The ASV can be pre-loaded with up to three racquetballs before each scoring run.
Stationary Vessels
Custom built vessels
Orange
Black
Specifications being finalized and will be shared in the next version of Team Handbook.
Racquetballs
FJBM Squash Ball
Red
Blue
Orange
5.5 cm diameter
The Return to Home task demonstrates the ability for the ASV to navigate back to the launch point while avoiding interaction with any obstacles. The ASV returns through the gate created with two black buoys in autonomous mode after attempting Autonomy Challenge tasks. The ASV avoids all obstacles and task equipment (buoys, floating docks, etc.) on the way back. The time bonus will be awarded based on the number of seconds remaining on the timeslot clock and overall points earned during run.
Buoys are supplied from Polyform US, shop.polyform.com.
Obstacle Buoy
Polyform A-0
A-0
Black
0.5 ft
(above waterline)
20.3 cm
For the tasks with reporting aspects (Task 2 and Task 4) the ASV may choose to report information to the judges one of two ways:
Method 1: The ASV may perform a maneuver consisting of driving in circles or rotating (in Yaw) in place, where every 360 degrees of rotation signifies one object detected.
Method 2: The number of identified objects may visually be reported on the ASV’s operator control system or computer provided by the teams. The teams must notify a judge to be ready to observe the report at the end of the task. This visual display must be clear to read, with the number display font size no less than 0.5” tall and persist on screen without intervention for at least 30 seconds.
Either method must be completed before the ASV moves away from the task being reported on. Any report made before the ASV has entered the task will not be considered for points.
This Team Handbook contains information that teams need to compete at the 2025 RoboBoat Competition. It includes task descriptions, rules, requirements, and other guidance and specifications. Teams are encouraged to read this document for a thorough understanding of what is necessary to compete effectively.
RoboBoat is an international student program established to generate, cultivate, and enhance a community of innovators capable of making substantive contributions to the Autonomous Surface Vehicle (ASV) domain. The vision is achieved by providing a venue and mechanism, whereby practitioners of robotics and maritime autonomy come together at RoboBoat to share knowledge, innovate, and collaboratively advance the technology of ASV systems. Teams must also document their designs as described in this Team Handbook.
The objective of RoboBoat is to build an international community of innovators – ranging from high school to higher education, capable of making substantive contributions to the maritime field and pushing development of small-scale (X-Class) ASV. The competition has been held annually since 2008.
Participants of RoboBoat may expect to:
Increase technical proficiency;
Establish valuable professional connections; and
Enjoy the satisfaction of learning and collaborating while advancing the technology of ASV systems.
The nominal winners are those teams that have scored the most points. The real winners are all those participants who have learned something lasting about working together to create an autonomous system that accomplished a challenging mission in a complex environment.
Maritime autonomous technology is critical to monitoring and healing our oceans. Developing the human resource to expand this effort is even more essential.
This section includes detailed requirements and instructions for the autonomy challenge portion of the competition.
These challenges showcase ASV performance through autonomous behaviors designed to represent research and real-world applications.
Three Qualifying and Practice Courses are available for teams to practice, demonstrate proficiency, and qualify for the Semi-Finals Round. These courses consist of all six (6) tasks. Multiple teams may be on a Qualifying and Practice Course at the same time. Teams may schedule times to practice or complete individual tasks on these courses with the Technical Director. Teams may attempt completion on individual tasks in any order.
The minimum success criteria for qualifying on the individual tasks will be included in the next version of the Team Handbook.
This section includes a detailed overview of the competition scoring.
Scores are calculated by the judges' evaluation and observation. All decisions of the judges are final.
Design documentation must be submitted in accordance with the requirements outlined in and the deadlines listed in , to be eligible for full points. After the competition, the judges will issue overall standings in the design documentation portion of the competition.
The design documentation scoring breakdown is summarized in the table below.
The Autonomy Challenge occurs in three rounds: Qualifying Round, Semi-Finals, and Finals. For the Qualifying Round minimum performance criteria is specified and no points are awarded. Qualifying Round and task completion criteria will be shared in the next version of the Team Handbook.
For the Semi-Final and Final Rounds points are awarded, as outlined in this section. Upon completion of the Semi-Finals Round, the judges will announce the top-scoring teams who will progress to the Finals Round. The judges have the discretion to select the number of teams advancing to the Finals Round.
After the competition, the judges will issue Autonomy Challenge overall standings. Any team accepted into the Finals Round will be ranked ahead of all teams that did not participate in the Finals Round.
A full scoring breakdown will be shared in the next version of the Team Handbook.
Awards are provided in three categories: Autonomy Challenge standings, Design Documentation standings, and Special Awards. Teams must be present to collect their awards, and award money will be issued within 4-6 weeks after the competition.
Teams are awarded prize money reflective of their autonomy challenge ranking after scores are calculated. The first-place teams receive a RoboNation champion banner.
Teams are awarded prize money reflective of their design documentation ranking after scores are calculated.
Throughout the competition, teams, judges, and staff are asked to be on the lookout for exemplary behavior from teams to acknowledge with special awards. A digital nomination form will be shared on-site to nominate teams for special awards.
Source:
Design Documentation
Potential Points
Technical Design Report
200
Website
180
Team Introduction Video
120
Design Presentation
180
System Assessment
180
Total Potential Points
860
This section includes detailed rules and requirements for the system developed to enter into the competition.
Teams that qualify will have access to the Semi-Finals Course once one becomes available. These courses consist of six (6) tasks: the mandatory navigation channel and tasks 2-6. Only one team may be on a Semi-Finals/Finals Course at a time. Note that teams may not know what course they are assigned until right before the start of their time slot.
During a Semi-Finals/Finals run the ASV must:
operate autonomously throughout the entire run; no remote-controlled survey runs allowed and teams must navigate directly back to the starting position with no deviations when resetting for another run.
enter the course through the gates in the Navigation Channel task.
attempt the remaining Tasks 2-5 of their choice, in any order.
return to home (Task 6) at the end of the run.
The scoring criteria for Semi-Finals and Finals are detailed in Section 4: Scoring.
Safe operations are a priority for the RoboBoat staff. All considerations to maintain safety for operators and the surrounding environment must be made. These guidelines are the minimum requirements for all teams and their vehicles during the competition.
All Radio Frequency (RF) equipment must be operated within the rules and regulations of the host country. This includes, but is not limited to, frequency, transmitting power, antenna height, etc.
ASV power systems must follow the safety rules and regulations of the host country as well as the team’s home country.
RoboBoat staff may suspend team operations at any time for safety considerations. The staff is not required to advise the team prior to the decision to terminate the run attempt. In all matters of safety, the decisions of the RoboBoat staff are final.
Before operating in the water, all systems must pass a safety inspection. This includes, but is not limited to:
A Safety Inspector completes a safety checklist, verifying successful operation of all safety features at each unmanned system launch.
Teams demonstrate compliance with all the requirements, to include identifying all actuators, and moving parts and their associated protection mechanisms (shrouds, etc.).
Verification of both kill switches’ operation (remote and physical). This is repeated each time a team enters the water.
Demonstrate On-board Kill Switch
Demonstrate Remote Kill Switch
Vehicle killed when transmitter loses link?
Verify tele-operation link (remote control)
Vehicle have forward and/or aft tow line?
Any safety issues related to the propellers?
Any potentially dangerous protrusions?
Is everything properly secured to the system?
Is system properly protected from rain? (recommended)
Teams are required to understand and follow battery safety best practices on the battery chemistry selected by the team. Lithium-ion chemistry batteries may become damaged and create a hazard if misused/abused, representing the greatest risk to people, facilities, and the environment. The following safety rules and requirements must be followed:
Teams will be required to attend a mandatory battery safety briefing prior to the start of the competition.
Teams must submit battery specifications, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), and proper disposal procedures, sourced from the battery manufacturer for all batteries.
Teams must keep a hard copy of the battery safety documentation for all batteries in Team Village (onsite) at all times, for reference.
Teams must bring a LiPo safe bag(s) adequate for the lithium batteries used. LiPo bag(s) must be available at the competition and the hotel.
Li-Po (Lithium Polymer) battery packs need cell level safety and balancing circuits.
Batteries must be shipped according to required shipping regulations based on battery weight/type. Note that most batteries are considered HAZMAT and must be shipped using HAZMAT regulations.
Each team must understand and follow their own country’s regulations as well as those of the host nation.
All batteries must be stored, used, and maintained in accordance with manufacturer guidelines.
Teams are required to inspect their batteries daily for signs of swelling, heat, leaking, venting, burning or any other irregularities.
Lithium batteries that become too warm during use or have become swollen or malformed must be removed from use and reported to the Technical Director.
Lithium batteries that do not hold a charge must be removed from use and reported to the Technical Director.
A team member must be present at all times to monitor charging batteries.
At the competition site, if any of the above battery conditions are observed, students must immediately notify the Technical Director or RoboBoat staff and provide the battery specifications and safety information.
At the hotel, if a battery irregularity occurs at any time, students must notify RoboNation’s Senior Events Manager, Cheri Koch immediately by phone at 850.642.0536 and provide the battery specifications and safety information.
Failed or failing Lithium-ion batteries must be handled in accordance with manufacturer’s safety and disposal guidelines. In the absence of specific guidelines, batteries must be placed in a LiPo safe bag, which must then be placed in a bucket, covered with sand, and placed in a designated safety zone.
Teams cannot change or replace batteries when ASV is in the water or while standing on floating docks.
The ASV must comply with the kill switch requirements detailed below. The ASV must have two emergency stop systems, also known as ‘kill switches’ or ‘E-Stops’.
On-Board: A hard-wired, on-board, emergency stop system.
Off-Board: A wireless remote emergency stop, located off-board and on its own frequency and link.
Both systems must operate in a failsafe fashion (if any part of the system fails, the battery dies or is removed, the system must enter emergency stop) and upon activation of either system (on-board or off-board), the switch must instantaneously disconnect power from the vehicle’s thruster units. An example of how to implement this is shown in Figure 11. System should be designed such that power, to the thrusters, cannot be restored until the emergency switch is reset.
The Technical team will conduct a detailed engineering and safety inspection including a team demonstration of the proper operation of all emergency systems. This includes the removal of the remote kill switch battery to prove it fails safe. Teams must be prepared to discuss the design and implementation of their fail-safe systems in detail.
All ASVs must have an onboard emergency stop capable of being actuated by personnel from a support craft. For personnel safety, the switch may be triggered from a distance by a wooden or plastic pole/paddle. Keeping this in mind, teams should select rugged and reliable components for their safety system.
All ASVs must be equipped with a portable, handheld, Wireless Emergency Stop controller. This controller must immediately (less than 2 seconds) disconnect power to the vehicle’s thruster units when activated or when power/battery is removed from the transmitter. This system must also meet the host country RF guidelines for frequency and transmit power.
The ability to avoid obstacles is a core capability for unmanned systems. Each buoy on the course represents an object to be avoided or approached in some way. In addition, obstacle buoys may be placed throughout the operating areas in an effort to provide a more representative real-world challenge.
All team members must abide by the RoboNation Code of Conduct while participating in the Competition. Failure to abide by this Code of Conduct at any point during the competition season may result in the disqualification of the team and/or participants from the Competition, components of the competition, the full competition, and/or future competitions.
Teams must build an ASV to compete and only enter one vehicle in the competition.
Teams that arrive at the competition failing to meet the vehicle requirements will not be permitted on the course, until the vehicle is modified to meet all requirements.
Teams must be comprised of 75% or more full-time students. ()
First-year teams are eligible to participate in RoboBoat without an ASV. These teams are expected to participate in Design Documentation and send representation on-site at the event as a learning experience. First-year teams must indicate this option in their registration form.
One student member of the team must be designated as the “team lead”. The team lead must be conversationally fluent in English. The team lead, and only the team lead, will speak for the team during the competition runs.
Teams must have at least one representative present for the team orientation. Teams who miss orientation will not be permitted to deploy their ASV.
Team leads are required to attend daily team meetings conducted by the Technical Director.
Teams must have at least one representative present onsite at the competition venue during the competition hours (8:00 am – 5:30 pm) to be eligible for prizes. If teams cannot be onsite, they must notify RoboNation staff in a timely manner.
Before operating in the water, all systems must pass a safety inspection. ()
During any Semi-Finals or Finals run the ASV and OCU computers must not connect or be open to connections from any source of communication from the internet or anywhere onsite other than equipment stationed in the course operating tents.
No combustion engines of any type may be used on the ASV.
Course boundaries are clearly identified. The ASV must stay within the course or task boundaries while attempting any tasks.
An Autonomy Challenge run will be terminated if the ASV interferes with course elements or crosses through a different course. This includes entangling, dragging, pushing, or damaging course elements or landscape.
All decisions of the judges are final. ()
RoboBoat organizers are not responsible for any damage to a team’s ASV as a consequence of participating in the competition.
The following is a list of minimal requirements for a vehicle to be permitted access to a course. Teams that arrive at the competition failing to meet the vehicle requirements will not be permitted on the course, until the vehicle is modified to meet all requirements.
Autonomy: Vehicle shall be fully autonomous and shall have all autonomy decisions made onboard the ASV.
Buoyancy: The vehicle shall be positively buoyant.
Communication: The vehicle cannot send or receive any control information while in autonomous mode (to and from Operators Control Station).
Towable: The vehicle must have a multi-point tow harness installed at all times to allow staff to attach a rope and tow the vehicle through the water. Underslung harnesses will NOT be permitted.
Energy source: The vehicle must be battery powered. All batteries must be sealed to reduce the hazard from acid or caustic electrolytes. The open circuit voltage of any battery (or battery system) may not exceed 60Vdc.
Kill Switch: The vehicle must have at least one 1.5 inch diameter red button located on the vehicle that, when actuated, must instantaneously disconnect power from all motors and actuators. ()
Wireless Kill Switch: In addition to the physical kill-switch, the vehicle must have at least one remote kill switch that, when actuated, must instantaneously disconnect power from all motors and actuators. If the remote kill switch system is powered off or battery removed, vehicle must default to a state in which power is disconnected from all motors and actuators. ()
Propulsion: Any propulsion system may be used (thruster, paddle, etc.). However, all moving parts must have protection. For instance, a propeller must be shrouded.
Remote-controllable: The vehicle must be remote-controllable (tele-operated) to be brought back to the dock. If the remote controller is turned off (or power is interrupted), vehicle must default to a state in which all motors and actuators are automatically commanded to 0% thrust or an off state. Driving the vehicle through a laptop is STRONGLY discouraged.
Safety: All sharp, pointy, moving or sensitive parts must be covered and marked.
Size: The vehicle must fit within a six feet, by three feet, by three feet "box". (Any extensions from the hull can exceed these dimensions during a run.)
Surface: The vehicle must float or use ground effect of the water. Mostly submerged/flying vehicles are forbidden for use as primary autonomous platform.
Weight: The entire maritime system shall weigh less than 140 lbs.
All teams are required to register to compete using the Registration form found on the RoboBoat website, . This registration collects each team’s point of contact information, demographics, and the Pre-Competition Requirements outlined in and .
To complete the RoboBoat 2025 registration, teams must pay the registration fee of $1,000 USD.
To cancel a registration, teams must complete the . Cancellation requests submitted via email will not be accepted. Click here to review the cancellation and refund policy: .
First-year teams are eligible to participate in RoboBoat without an ASV. These teams are expected to participate in Design Documentation and send representation on-site at the event as a learning experience. First-year teams are expected to indicate this option in their registration form.
Teams are responsible for coordinating their own lodging and travel plans.
RoboNation has contracted with a local hotel to provide a special rate for RoboBoat teams. Teams are responsible for booking their own lodging for the event. More information to be released at a later date.
VISA Process – It is recommended for international students to acquire a B-1 Visitor VISA to attend the competition. However, if the student has plans for any other activities besides the competition, they may choose to investigate other types of visas. Explore the different types of visas: .
Invitation Letter – Once a team is officially registered and the registration fee is paid, they are eligible to request invitation letters. During the , each team member are given the opportunity to request an invitation letter issued by RoboNation. Contact with any questions.
Teams are responsible for coordinating the necessary shipping to ensure arrival of vehicle and equipment. Any shipping questions can be directed to Cheri Koch at / 850.642.0536. More shipping instructions to be released at a later date.
Each team is provided with a 10’ x 10’ working area in a tent that includes two tables / seven chairs, one electrical outlet (120V 60 Hz 15A), and a wireless internet connection. The Team Village is a tent with sidewalls that resides on a flat grassy field surface. Although the covered workspace is weather resistant, teams are discouraged from leaving sensitive electronics/equipment exposed in the tent.
Teams should conduct development, maintenance, and repair of their systems in their designated area in Team Village. Batteries may be charged during the day at the Team Village but may not be left charging overnight.
Teams are provided with an area along the shoreline near the course areas where they are able to set up their shore equipment. Each course has a 10’ x 10’ tent-covered area with a single table per tent, 120V 60Hz 15A power, and a hard-wired Ethernet connection to the Technical Director network. The power provided is for Operator Control Station (OCS) use only and shall not be extended to any platforms on the beach. This space is shared between all teams utilizing the course.
The United States uses a 120V 60Hz 15A electrical outlet plug. Usually three pins, two parallel blades (one wider than the other), and an offset semi-round pin. The wider blade is Neutral, the shorter blade is Hot/Line and the third pin is Ground. Teams will only get one 15A service and should not connect more load than that.
This event is open to the public. Consider the possible attendance from future employers or sponsors.
A large, red button should be installed in such a way that safety personnel, from the support craft can easily actuate the button. The engage/disengage button should be red in color and have a ‘press to activate and twist/pull to reset’ feature. This button, momentary contact switch or not, should cut power to the thrusters immediately on actuation. The thrusters must remain in a powered-down state until the judge gives permission for the team to reinitialize the system. An example of a suitable button is shown in Figure 12 and can be found at .
Vehicles are deployed and recovered in the water on the required cart provided by each team, using a portable rollout mat. The temporary walkway is similar to the Mobi-mat, available at . The cart will get wet as it’s submerged during deployment and recovery. RoboBoat staff are responsible for recovering any lost vehicles. All reasonable efforts to recover a lost vehicle will be made, but the recovery of a lost vehicle cannot be guaranteed. All teams recognize by entering the competition, they risk damage to, or the loss of, their vehicle.
This section includes detailed instructions and requirements that are required to register and participate in the competition.
RoboBoat teams have a variety of opportunities to interact with each other and the RoboBoat staff leading up to the event.
Leading up to the on-site competition, teams are asked to send a representative to regularly scheduled virtual meetings. These TeamTime meetings are hosted by the RoboBoat organizers and technical team to provide teams with competition updates and the opportunity to ask questions. Teams can find the meeting dates and details on the website, Discord, and email.
All questions, comments, and suggestions should be posted on the RoboBoat Discord. Teams are encouraged to actively participate in the online community and monitor it for the latest news and updates regarding all things RoboBoat.
Each team must designate a student team member as their team lead. The team lead is the only person allowed to speak for the team. The team lead is the only person permitted to request vehicle deployment, run start, run end, or vehicle retrieval. The team lead must be conversationally fluent in English to communicate with RoboBoat staff. Teams who do not have members fluent in English should contact RoboBoat staff as soon as possible.
The RoboBoat Technical Director Team consists of a Technical Director, Safety Inspectors and Course Managers.
The RoboBoat Staff are identified with “Staff” shirts.
The official competition website is www.RoboBoat.org/2025. This website includes all official documents and a detailed list of the registered RoboBoat teams. Helpful resources, past competition results, and other engagement opportunities can be found on this website. Information and documents are updated regularly, and it is the team’s responsibility to check the website for updates.
This information is collected prior to participation on-site at the competition, during the registration process. Submission requirements, guidelines, and scoring rubrics can be found in Section 2: Design Documentation.
Design Documentation submissions collected before the competition include:
Teams are invited to outline their educational outreach efforts. This activity is not scored; however, it will be shared online for the community and can be eligible for special awards and recognition. Teams may submit a description (500 word limit) of their activities and any supporting documents.
A Data Sharing project has been established for registered teams competing in RoboNation’s autonomous competitions: RoboBoat, SUAS, RoboSub, and RobotX. This project aims to increase collaboration between teams and to provide access to shared resources and test data to validate and debug the reliability and robustness of teams’ machine vision algorithms. Access information will be provided in the team registration process, outlined in Section 5.1 Register and Intent to Compete.
For the data sharing guide and more information on Data Sharing, visit RoboNation.org/data-sharing.
During the registration process, teams must provide a generic email account and a team acronym that is used in the Data Sharing project. The generic email can be associated with any email provider. An example of the Generic Email is: roboboat-team@outlook.com. The team acronym must be within 2-10 characters, abbreviating the team’s school or organization. Examples of the team acronym are: RN or ROBOTEAM.
Access is given to teams that complete the Registration form. Only official registered teams maintain access to the Data Sharing project for the competition season.
This information is collected prior to participation on-site at the competition, during the registration process.
This form is required for all team members, advisors, and chaperones planning to attend the competition on-site. Each individual will be able to enter and submit their own information using this process. This information includes name, contact information, dietary restrictions, academic information, optional resume, emergency contact information, signed forms, and a request for an invitation letter.
Download the (required of all minor and adult participants)
Download the (required of all adult participants, over the age of 18 years)
The registration owner will need to collect an email address for each team member to send the team member registration form. For team members that are minors, please enter the email of a parent or guardian to complete the form.
The registration owner is responsible for following up with each team member to complete this task before the deadline.
Team demographics are collected to determine program impact on students and in educational settings. This information may also be shared with any eligible sponsors.
Using the RoboBoat Competition Shop, teams place an order for their team's shirts. A discount code is provided in the registration portal to receive the first five t-shirts for free. Additional shirts cost $15 each.
This submission documents a list of all components utilized in the system design. In cases where components were developed by the team versus purchased off the shelf, this information should be included. Additionally, if commercial off the shelf equipment were significantly modified this should be noted. Under the column marked “Specs” a web link to the manufacturer’s specifications may be provided. This standardized table will help document and track trends in component (hardware and software) usage and team metrics.
Organization name
Team name
Shipping POC
Shipping POC mobile number
Shipping POC email address
Number of crates
Dimensions for each crate
Estimated shipping date
Shipping Company
Type of shipment – Air, ground, ocean
Has initial pick-up or drop off been scheduled – include date of pick-up or drop off
Is this a dangerous good shipment? If so, has a dangerous goods shipment been arranged?
Have you scheduled your outbound shipment pick-up or drop off? Provide pick-up details (date/time) for any pick-up from the hotel.
Additional information for shipment, if needed.
Teams are required to submit battery specifications, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), and proper disposal procedures, sourced from the battery manufacturer for all batteries. More information can be found in.
Teams are required to submit a shipping plan to facilitate shipment receipt/handling at the competition hotel. Shipping guidelines can be found in . This shipping plan must include:
Component
Vendor
Model/Type
Specs
Custom/Purchased
Cost
Year of
Purchase
ASV Hull Form/Platform
Waterproof Connectors
Propulsion
Power System
Motor Controls
CPU
Teleoperation
Compass
Intertial Measurement Unit (IMU)
Doppler Velocity Logger (DVL)
Camera(s)
Hydrophones
Algorithms
Vision
Localization and Mapping
Autonomy
Open-Source Software
Phrase
Definition
Practice Courses
These courses are designed to provide opportunities to demonstrate proficiency in one task at a time. They contain an instance of each task.
Team Lead
Designated spokesperson for each team.
Technical Director Team
Technical team that runs the courses, safety inspections, set-up, and tear-down.
RoboBoat Event Staff
RoboBoat support personnel.
Judge
Subject Matter Experts that observe and score the Autonomy Challenge and Design Documentation.
Sponsor
Organizations that provide support to RoboBoat.
Acronym
Definition
ASV
Autonomous Surface Vehicle
N/A
Not available
OCS
Operator Control Station
RGB
Red, Green, Blue
RF
Radio Frequency
TD
Technical Director
TDR
Technical Design Report